The Philosophy of the Actualize Approach to Therapeutic and Motivational Life Coaching - The How of Living
The
Actualize Philosophy
Part
Two: The
How of Living
"Each
culture has its own norms for health, for ideal states of mind,
and for the functioning of individuals in society", Suman
Fernando
Another important dimension of human existence is the
social realm. Rather than us sharing a universal human nature that
guides human behaviour, we are born into a social context that shapes
human growth and development. We are not determined by our society,
but we are born into a social context with specific conditions of
possibility: what is possible in our society would not necessarily
be possible in others.
New
possibilities can come into being as the conditions of possibility
change, and conditions of possibility change as a result of cultural
change borne of human activity.
An
important consideration is what conditions of possibility exist for
us as individuals. If we internalise social norms, values and expectations
of what we can achieve, then our aspirations will be constructed within
our cultural context. As a result, the possibilities available to us
would be restricted to those possibilities presented as permissable.
Restrictions of possibility can be especially acute for those of us
who are old, who are young, who are female, who are disabled, who are
not white, who are working class, who are not British, who have mental
health difficulties, who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender,
who have a learning disability. It follows that barriers to actualization
exist in our social world.
Although
British society has moved on in many respects, this classic sketch
broadcast on The Frost Report in 1967 captures the prescribed
possibilities of living perfectly.
;
In
addition to our behaviours being framed by our social experience, our
emotions are also subject to the conditions of possibility existing
in our society.
Shame
is a perfect example of our socially constructed emotional life because
it relates to the act of transgressing social norms and morality.
A behaviour that is acceptable and normal in one culture, for example
walking around naked in a communal space, would probably elicit a
sense of shame if you found yourself walking around naked in London's
Oxford Street. At a more personal level, the values and norms that
we have adopted and accepted within our families will vary between
people, because the positions we each choose to adopt are chosen from
among a range of different possibilities (the promise is that we can
always choose to adopt other positions if the ones we have adopted
are not helpful). Therefore, you may feel shame if you leave
your home unshaven, because being clean-shaven is synonymous with
being 'acceptable', while I will leave my home with stubble
and without a second thought. A simple example which, nevertheless,
suggests that our emotional life is also framed by the societies we
live in.
Therefore,
it seems that we live in a social context at this point in time,
where a range of possibilities for living are available. The question
is whether you've chosen the best possibilities to achieve your full
potential.
"The
categories of perception of the social world are the product of the
internalization of the social space. The sense of one’s place
as a sense of what one can or cannot ‘permit oneself’ implies
a tacit acceptance of one’ place, a sense of limits”
Pierre Bourdieu
“Maybe
the target nowadays is not to discover what we are but to refuse what
we are”
Michel Foucault
“Shame
is a thoroughly moral concept involving violation of a social code”
Carl Ratner